The recent death of Senator Dianne Feinstein at the age of 90 has brought forth a wave of tributes and remembrances from the Left. While many laud her as a trailblazer and a champion for various causes, it’s essential to critically examine her legacy, particularly her relentless pursuit to destroy America’s Second Amendment rights.
Feinstein’s political career was undeniably shaped by the tragic assassination of Mayor George Moscone and Supervisor Harvey Milk in 1978. This traumatic event, while deeply personal to her, became the foundation for her aggressive stance on gun control.
However, one must question whether personal trauma should be the driving force behind legislation that affects millions.
Her most notorious contribution, or to some, her most significant overreach, was the federal ban on military-style assault weapons from 1994 to 2004. While Feinstein and her supporters championed this as a necessary step to curb gun violence, it was a direct infringement on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens. The fact that the ban was allowed to expire in 2004 speaks to its questionable effectiveness and the concerns many had about its constitutionality.
It’s worth noting that even after witnessing firsthand the horrors of gun violence, Feinstein herself once carried a gun for personal protection. Can you say “Only One”? This fact underscores a concerning double standard: advocating for restrictive gun laws while benefiting from the very rights she sought to curtail for others.
Beyond the assault weapons ban, Feinstein’s attempts to reintroduce similar legislation, especially after the tragic 2012 Connecticut elementary school shooting, faced significant opposition. Many believed that her efforts, while perhaps well-intentioned, missed the mark.
Comments on X regarding the Senator’s death were not as kind:
To celebrate the death of @SenFeinstein, we’re offering free shipping on ammunition to California customers today through October 31st.
Simply select “Good Riddance, Dianne” at checkout!
Evil authoritarians should be mocked in death the same as they are in life.
No quarter. pic.twitter.com/PNbuBQGbQf
— Feni Ammunition (@FenixAmmunition) September 29, 2023
You dedicated nearly your entire life to trying to disarm the country. The time not spent doing so was spent insider trading for personal gain while millions of Americans suffered. You will not be missed now that you are gone. pic.twitter.com/RF7Wy4d8G7
— 9mmSMG (@9mm_smg) September 29, 2023
— Sal the Agorist (@SallyMayweather) September 29, 2023
— Libertarian Party NH (@LPNH) September 29, 2023
Instead of addressing the root causes of gun violence, such as mental health and socio-economic factors, she seemed singularly focused on limiting Americans’ access to firearms.
Feinstein served as a Senator entirely too long, but her stance on gun control didn’t solely define tenure. Her decision to release the 2014 report on the CIA’s detention and interrogation practices after the 9/11 attacks was controversial. While some praised her for transparency, others saw it as a move that jeopardized national security. Similarly, her support for the NSA’s surveillance programs in 2013 was viewed by many as a significant government overreach, further eroding the rights of Americans.
In reflecting on Senator Feinstein’s legacy, it’s clear that her approach to the Second Amendment was deeply flawed. While her personal experiences undoubtedly shaped her perspective, legislation should be grounded in the Constitution and the rights it guarantees to all citizens.
Feinstein’s relentless quest against the Second Amendment serves as a reminder of the need for vigilance in defending our rights, even in the face of well-intentioned but misguided efforts.